Maeglin Yedi ([info]maeglinyedi) wrote,
  • Mood: tired

Essay: From Orphan to Overlord

From Orphan to Overlord

JKR likes us to believe that Lord Voldemort is an evil, at times one-dimensional, villain. But JKR herself admitted that Voldemort wasn't born evil. With the facts and clues that she gives us, we can trace Tom Riddle's steps and figure out some of his motivations for becoming a Dark Lord.

First, let's look at some facts. Lord Voldemort was born in 1927, as Tom Marvolo Riddle. His father, a Muggle, had left his mother, a witch, before he was born, and his mother died shortly after giving birth to him.

So Tom grew up in a Muggle orphanage. This happened in a time when the economy was down in Britain. The whole of Europe was stuck between two World Wars, and there was an overall economic depression. Orphans were of little importance to anyone during those days, as is illustrated by the Child Migrants among other things. (British government shipped orphans overseas as cheap labor, from 1618 until as late as 1967.)

What little funding orphanages got either came from the church, the state, or both. But it was barely enough to feed and clothe all the children, and offer them some sort of basic schooling. These kids knew no luxury whatsoever, and often competed amongst themselves for more food. Children are cruel, and children in an orphanage during those days particularly learned that it was everyone for themselves.

This is the climate Tom grew up in. No proper guidance from adults, physical punishments (which were still common in those days), and strong competition amongst the children. And considering that Tom is a wizard, and must have had magical accidents like all wizarding kids have, there's a good chance the other children must have thought of him as a freak.

Yes, that makes a nice parallel with Harry.

And then one day, young Tom, who has learned to take what he can get because otherwise someone else will take it from him, gets a letter from a certain wizarding school. And he learns that he isn't a freak at all, but a young wizard who is expected to attend a school especially for wizards.

I imagine the boy must have been ecstatic, besides confused, of course.

When we look at how little Harry Potter knew of the wizarding world when he started at Hogwarts, we can assume that Tom Riddle wouldn't have known a great deal more by the time he boarded the Hogwarts Express. Perhaps one of the teachers had taken him for a trip to Diagon Alley, to help him get his school supplies, so Tom would have gotten a glimpse of wizarding life, but it couldn't have been much.

And then little Tom Riddle is sorted into Slytherin.

Imagine an eleven-year-old boy with little to no knowledge of the House of Slytherin introducing himself as having grown up in a Muggle orphanage. And possibly even knowing, and telling, that his father is a Muggle.

Yes, once again Tom is treated as a freak by his fellow, pure-blooded Slytherin students. And everything Tom has learned in the Muggle orphanage is proven true once again. Everyone for themselves and take what you can take. I don't believe Tom had an easy time those first couple of years at Hogwarts, especially since none of the adults would have cared much for his situation, as is shown throughout the HP books. Adults simply don't look after the students, even when the students could use a little support.

Now, I think the first taste of power Tom ever got, didn't happen at Hogwarts. No, I believe that the first time Tom realized he could be stronger than anyone else, was during one of the holidays he was forced to spend at the orphanage. Imagine Tom looking at all the Muggle orphans, and thinking: I can hurt you all with a single hex.

And that thought, that realization, is the first taste of real power Tom ever got. And it was a very distinctive taste: power over Muggles.

Since Tom had always learned to take what was there to take, he must have cherished that realization. I don't think he did anything with it yet, since that could have gotten him expelled from Hogwarts, but he knew. And that was enough.

Sometime during his first couple of years at Hogwarts, Tom learned that he was the heir of Salazar Slytherin. And this knowledge turned the tables for him in Slytherin House. One way or the other, he convinced his fellow Slytherins that he belonged in their House, and maybe even earned a bit of respect from them.

What really drove Tom down the path that would result in the creation of Lord Voldemort, is his discovery of the Chamber of Secrets. Tom, as any teenager, would have been looking for ways to test the world around him. He discovered (perhaps by accident at an earlier age already) that he could speak parsel-tongue, and that he could control a basilisk. He discovered that through that basilisk he held power over others: the entire student-body and staff of Hogwarts.

But more importantly, he discovered that he could get away with it.

He set the basilisk after Muggle-borns, and was able to frame a fellow student for the death of an innocent girl. Now, that's real power to have for a teenage boy.

And that was the moment Tom Riddle decided to become Lord Voldemort. Not because he hated Muggles or Muggle-born wizards.

But because he could.

It's a simple matter of adding things up. He learned he had power over Muggles. He heard about how purebloods are so much better than anyone else from his fellow Slytherin students. He learned that he himself was the heir to a powerful wizard who was famous for preaching about pureblood superiority. And he learned that he could get away with murder.

Take what you can take.

While I believe Tom disliked Muggles, I don't think he hated them. Yes, his experiences at the orphanage and with his Muggle father wouldn't have been too positive, but that's not the reason he decided to go after muggle-born and half-blood wizards.

It was a matter of learning that he had the power to do it. And for a child who grew up without any power whatsoever, that must have been an instant addiction.

I believe he wrote his famous diary at the time he decided to take that path and create a new identity for himself. As a living memory of who he had been and of what he had become.

And creating a new identity for himself only made sense. After all, how serious would people take a half-blood preaching about pureblood superiority. So he made a neat little anagram, and by the time he left Hogwarts, he cut all his ties with his old identity.

So he murdered his father. I believe he had several motivations for that. First, revenge. Plain and simple. His father had left him and his mother. In the eyes of a seventeen-year-old he deserved to pay for that. And Tom had gotten away with murder once before, so why shouldn't he be able to get away with it again.

But cutting his ties with his old identity and perhaps his father's wealth are also possible motivations for Tom to do what he did.

And then he disappeared for decades. This is one of the most important facts that show that Voldemort is anything but rash. He likes to take his time for things. He knows how important it is to prepare things properly.

If he'd been rash, he would have forced himself onto the wizarding world right after he left Hogwarts. But Tom had seen failure already, and knew he would have to plan carefully.

And he had seen it with Grindelwald. The Dark Wizard Dumbledore defeated. And a very valuable lesson for Tom, I imagine.

I believe he spent the time between his disappearance and his appearance as Lord Voldemort familiarizing himself with all aspects of the wizarding world, learning Dark Magic, and forming a solid plan to get the power he was after.

When he reappeared as Lord Voldemort, I believe he didn't go about cursing the trousers off people and forcing them to join him. Tom was very good at playing people. This is shown in the fact that he was a model student, a prefect and a Head Boy, and fooled the entire staff of Hogwarts into believing he was only a poor but brilliant student. Only Dumbledore may have suspected things weren't all what they seemed to be, but even Dumbledore did not know what was really going on in Tom's mind at that time.

Lord Voldemort was probably the perfect politician. He talked people into seeing things the way he saw them, and lured them into his service. He forced their loyalty by placing his Mark on them. Once you were in, there was no way out but death. A brilliant scheme, which gained him a lot of followers.

And had it not been for that nasty little boy named Harry Potter, Voldemort might have just won during the first war. In OotP it is said that Voldemort outnumbered the Order two to one, and Order members were dropping like flies.

So we have a boy who literally worked himself up to become perhaps the most powerful wizard in the world. Voldemort knew he could lose that power just as easy as he had gotten it, and he would do anything to keep it. He had been a fighter all his life, never knew any better. So when he heard of that prophecy, and that there might be a child who could defeat him, I believe Voldemort panicked. Or at least, didn't think things through as carefully as he should have.

He was at his strongest, and the success he'd already had perhaps blinded him for his own weaknesses. He knew one thing, though: that child had to die. So when he finally had young Harry Potter at wand point, there was only one thing on his mind, and it wasn't the fact that perhaps the mother's sacrifice could do him in.

Of course, Voldemort learned his lesson.

After he came back, Voldemort was again anything but rash. Arrogant, yes. Rash, no. He took a full year to try to get his hands on the prophecy. He used his time to set things up perfectly so Harry Potter would go down to the Ministry himself and retrieve the prophecy for him. He used Harry's weakest point, Harry's love for his godfather, against him.

But Voldemort once again underestimated Harry Potter. And I'm glad that he did, otherwise he would have won, and there wouldn't be a book six and seven for us to enjoy.

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Your reply will be screened

  • 64 comments
Previous
← Ctrl← Alt
  • 1
  • 2
Next
Ctrl →Alt →

[info]raevenwynter

March 25 2004, 23:45:45 UTC 8 years ago

I love you. Thanks for posting this.

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 00:26:51 UTC 8 years ago

You're welcome. :-)

[info]cayendi

March 26 2004, 00:04:35 UTC 8 years ago

I might not agree with you on every point, but this is a very well thought through essay. A very convincing one as well.
Even though I gathered from your last rant that you like his character, the essay seems very impartial to me.
Very well done :)


your essay brings to mind two comments that I've come across on the net though.
the first one was that no muggles/mudbloods had ever been sorted into Slytherin
the second one was that there is some doubt about Tom having been in Slytherin ... followed by the comment that only Hagrid had said so and that maybe Hagrid said it to imprint on Harry that Slytherin was 'bad'

unfortunately I can't remember where I read that.

What are your opinions on these comments?

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 00:25:56 UTC 8 years ago

Thank, and yeah, I like his character. He has a lot of potential, even though JKR doesn't fully use that potential (yet).

the first one was that no muggles/mudbloods had ever been sorted into Slytherin

Tom wasn't a mudblood/muggle-born. He is a half-blood, which is a difference.

the second one was that there is some doubt about Tom having been in Slytherin ... followed by the comment that only Hagrid had said so and that maybe Hagrid said it to imprint on Harry that Slytherin was 'bad'

First, Ron confirms in chapter 6 of PS that Voldemort was a Slytherin, so it's not only Hagrid who said it. And secondly, why would Hagrid try to make Slytherin look bad if Voldemort hadn't been in it. I think the main reason so many people believe Slytherin House is 'bad', is because wizards like Voldemort were in it.

So, I don't agree with both those points.

[info]cayendi

8 years ago

[info]rane_ab

March 26 2004, 00:33:11 UTC 8 years ago

I don't have the time to read your essay now unfortunately, but I just wanted to wish you a happy birthday. Have fun! :D

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 12:27:00 UTC 8 years ago

Thank you! :-)

[info]noblerot

March 26 2004, 02:02:16 UTC 8 years ago

Nice profile of Voldie and his motivations. Dickensian, with a sinister twist. Some initial reactions (written while half asleep, so for Chrissakes be gentle):

I'm glad you point out that Tom Riddle likely received his first lessons in cruelty from Muggles. I'm equally intrigued by the idea that some responsibility for Riddle's damaged conscience can be laid at the feet of his Hogwarts teachers. We've seen ample evidence of Dumbledore's pro-Gryffindor stance as headmaster. Was he any different as a professor? We've also seen the way Slytherins are stigmatized by the rest of the school (whether or not they deserve it is a debate for another time). Now picture Tom, a battered mixed-blood refugee from the Muggle world, finding himself a member of Hogwarts' pariah house… where he's snubbed by the pariahs themselves for his lack of pedigree.

Misery. Then voila! he discovers that he's special, after all. Special and dangerous. As you put it: Imagine Tom looking at all the Muggle orphans, and thinking: I can hurt you all with a single hex.

Yes. And as he grows into his powers, an even more intoxicating realization awaits: I can hurt wizards, too. I'm that good.

I do think Voldemort feels no small contempt for his fellow magic folk. He's his own species, after all, an externalized manifestation of his feelings of internal freakishness. The man - or whatever he is - has transformed his inability to assimilate into a lethal asset.

I agree with you that his character is driven more by the attraction of power than a hatred of Muggles. I also agree with this statement: Tom was very good at playing people. This is shown in the fact that he was a model student, a prefect and a Head Boy, and fooled the entire staff of Hogwarts into believing he was only a poor but brilliant student.

What I disagree with is the suggestion that he's retained his cunning in the last two HP books. Dude, JKR writes him as a buffoon. He's like a refugee from an extended Scooby Doo episode. Yes, manipulating Harry's love for Sirius was clever, but everything that followed spiraled into farce. "Give me the prophecy," indeed. I love the series, but I'm getting tired of Harry's continuing survival resting on Voldemort's continuing stupidity. The kid who lived deserves better.

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 12:35:05 UTC 8 years ago

Misery. Then voila! he discovers that he's special, after all. Special and dangerous.

Yep. And another important point to add to that stage in his life, is that he didn't have anyone to show him otherwise. We see in the books that adults simply don't interfere much with the students. Harry's fortunate because he made the 'right' friends and was sorted into the 'right' house. The only thing Tom learned from his friends was that it was all about purebloods, and anything less than that was inferior. And with his already poor background growing up in that orphanage, I believe he really didn't know any better than to go with what he learned from his fellow Slytherins.

I do think Voldemort feels no small contempt for his fellow magic folk.

I agree with that, yes, but I do think that didn't really come into play until later, possibly after he left Hogwarts.

What I disagree with is the suggestion that he's retained his cunning in the last two HP books. Dude, JKR writes him as a buffoon.

You've said it just right. JKR writes him as a buffoon, unfortunately. Which annoys me to no end, because with what we know of him from his past, he isn't a buffoon at all. But, well, JKR can't go writing him as a brilliant, cunning Dark Lord, because then there wouldn't be any Harry Potter books. It's a strange paradox, I guess.

[info]coell

March 26 2004, 02:36:12 UTC 8 years ago

*claps*

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 12:40:56 UTC 8 years ago

*bows* :-)

[info]forestgreen

March 26 2004, 03:04:16 UTC 8 years ago

The essay is really wonderful. It touches all the points of why I think there is far more to Lord Voldemort than your average ubervillain, power-hungry bad guy. The economical crisis, the common physicall punishments as ways to deal with indiscipline and the fact that he must have done accidental magic as a child, which would count as bad behaviour, even if he didn't intend to do it, are all things I've mentioned to friends when discussing motivations for Tom Riddle in becoming Lord Voldemort.

So, I fully agree with all of your points :D

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 12:41:50 UTC 8 years ago

Thank you, and yes, I firmly believe there's a lot more to Voldemort than what JKR shows us in the books, especially with what little we do know about him.

[info]moshi

March 26 2004, 04:21:29 UTC 8 years ago

An excellent essay, you've raised some very good points. On the whole, I agree. I want to read some Tom fic now. I'll add this to my memories if that's okay?

And: HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!!!!! Hope you have fun :0)

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 12:42:43 UTC 8 years ago

Thank you! And sure, feel free to add it to your memories. :-)

[info]a_belladonna

March 26 2004, 04:43:18 UTC 8 years ago

It's a very interesting essay, I really don't know what else to say. Did you read "Riddle me this ?
It's an essay about the Riddles and Voldemort and who his real allies may be.

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 12:43:18 UTC 8 years ago

Thank you! And no, I haven't read that essay before, but I will now. Thanks for the url! :-)

[info]waccawheels

March 26 2004, 06:17:47 UTC 8 years ago

This is why I love your essays.

By the way, speaking of Tom....

Happy Birthday! :D

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 12:44:00 UTC 8 years ago

You are simply the best!! *smooches*

[info]amanuensis1

March 26 2004, 06:22:57 UTC 8 years ago

Oh, this is cool! I love deciphering the psyche of Tom Riddle, and this is so well-argued. Nice!

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 12:44:52 UTC 8 years ago

Thank you! And yeah, Tom/Voldemort is a fascinating character, even though JKR doesn't use him all that well (yet) in the books.

[info]lonestarkate

March 26 2004, 06:27:34 UTC 8 years ago

Hmmm...*ponders*

Very well done.

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 12:45:11 UTC 8 years ago

Thanks. :-)

[info]puppy_tenchan

March 26 2004, 06:53:29 UTC 8 years ago

*applaud*

You have good points and a convincing line of arguements. This is a wonderful essay, Maeg. No matter if one agrees with you or not, you draw up a valuable theory, and you present it well structured and well thought through. That has to be appreciated.

And on my personal views on the theory itself: I am fascinated by the idea of Voldemort not being what he is because he has prejudices, but because he can. I am motivated to go with it. I just (sadly) don't get my hopes up that Voldemort's psyche will ever be brought up in such a thoughtful way in the books. I won't be surprised, if he continues to make horrible mistakes and eventually dies a dramatic, but completely shallow death. Sad.

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 13:32:39 UTC 8 years ago

Re: *applaud*

Thank you. The problem with Voldemort is, that we know so little about him. Just a few facts, and with those we can draw our own conclusions, which I tried to do with this essay.

I think his initial decicsion to become Lord Voldemort had everything to do with the simple notion that he could, and not so much with hatred of Muggles/Muggle-borns. The reason why he targeted them is because he was surrounded with Slytherins who would most likely have told him on every occasion that purebloods are superior, but also because Tom himself had learned he held power over Muggles (because he's a Wizard) and over Mudbloods (Basilisk because he's Slytherin's heir). I really believe that if Tom had gotten involved with a different crowd, he might have gone after a different 'enemy'.

[info]tocada

March 26 2004, 07:50:53 UTC 8 years ago

I would never accuse him of being rash if there were no Body Who Lived at all. Voldemort, and in this you would agree with Kandra that I deserve to die, is a clown of a villian. Have you ever read A Series of Unfortunate Events? Its cleverness shall taught those who pretend to keep a boy alive fiftheen years with a villian with such an intelligence and power than no one else has been able to kill him.
And I meant Dumbledore mighty one.
~T

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 13:46:30 UTC 8 years ago

I don't think Voldemort is a clown of a villain. I do believe JKR uses him for the wrong reasons, and thus portrays him as a one-dimensional character a bit too often.

But when looking at the facts, Voldemort isn't such a clown at all in canon. When the curse backfired, Voldemort lost his body. One can argue that it was stupid of him to go after the son when the mother had just sacrificed herself for the boy. But really, how common knowledge would that be? It was an act of love, according to Dumbledore, and knowing Voldemort he wouldn't have known much about love, so I really believe he had no idea the boy could best him at that point.

When he came back, in GoF, the first thing he did even before he got his body back was order Wormtail to kill Cedric. And then he himself went after Harry, and what happened then was something nobody could predict, I think. Their wands clashed, because they share an identical core. Had this not happened, Voldemort would have surely killed Harry.

And during OotP, it were Voldemort's Death Eaters who fucked up inside the Ministry of Magic, not Voldemort himself. It can be argued if it was a smart move of him to go to the Ministry personally, but as is shown by his lack of dramatic speech, he came there for only one reason, and that was to kill Harry. And he would have succeeded, had Dumbledore not jumped in at the last moment. It was Dumbledore who drove Voldemort away.

So, is Voldemort arrogant? Full of himself? Most definitely. But does that make him a clown? I think not.

[info]cluegirl

March 26 2004, 08:01:39 UTC 8 years ago

I also think it's important to consider the effects of WWII and the extensive bombing of Britain on the development of young Master Riddle. Even wizarding communities couldn't have escaped unscathed from what was essentially carpetbombing. And it's important to recall that war brings out the very best and the very worst that human beings are capable of containing -- ofttimes in the same human at the same time. So picture your young Riddle fighting Muggles for space in a bomb cellar, watching strong men who ought to be out fighting in the war shoving young mothers and children aside to make space for their dog, while a rail thin priest passes out Host in the corner because it's all the food he can lay his hands on. Picture his reaction to the looting, to the shattered people sitting in the rubble, to the food lines.

He had to be thinking 'Wizards could never do this! This is atrocity! These bombs are killing innocent people! Why isn't the Wizarding world STOPPING this?" How's that for a first step on a slippery slope?

[info]belleweather

March 26 2004, 11:49:36 UTC 8 years ago

Oh my goodness. You really ought to write that, really really. Please?

[info]cluegirl

March 26 2004, 08:03:35 UTC 8 years ago

Oh, and I almost forgot -- Happy Birthday!
*Since you gave me no warning, I've no gift for you. Will a spanking do instead?*

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 13:52:01 UTC 8 years ago

Thank you! And a spanking is most welcome. ;-)

[info]sistermagpie

March 26 2004, 08:23:19 UTC 8 years ago

Happy birthday--and interesting essay! Especially since I realized reading it that my own vague ideas about Tom Riddle were so different!

For instance, I had always somehow thought that Tom probably didn't tell too many people his father was a Muggle--though I can see how your idea of him making that mistake and being ostracized yet again is logical. I think I've always pictured Tom as associating Muggles with everything bad in the world once he finds out he is a wizard--even the faults of the wizarding world would trace back to them in some way for him. So I always picture him hiding his parentage. If someone found out I think he'd admit to it, but I always imagined him showing up and feeling incredibly angry that he was an outsider at Hogwarts due to growing up Muggle. Like he couldn't wait to cut all his ties to that world, but couldn't do it because even in the WW there they were.

So I guess I've always felt almost the opposite of what you're saying--that Voldemort does hate Muggles, since his focus on them is more of a weakness than a strength?

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 14:05:24 UTC 8 years ago

I think I've always pictured Tom as associating Muggles with everything bad in the world once he finds out he is a wizard--even the faults of the wizarding world would trace back to them in some way for him. So I always picture him hiding his parentage.

I've thought that exact same thing for a long time as well, because it seems the most obvious possibility.

However, when you look at how little Harry knows about the wizarding world in general, the differences between wizards and Muggles, and the four Houses, it's not at all unthinkable that Tom would have had a similar lack of knowledge when he first got to Hogwarts. After all, who would have told him? He grew up in a Muggle orphanage, in complete isolation of the wizarding world. I think he was just as clueless as Harry when he first set foot inside Hogwarts, and thus he probably didn't know it was a bad idea to talk about your Muggle experiences after he got sorted into Slytherin.

To me, that seems the most plausible, and I explored that idea in a ficlet (Before I Am Old).

And what I'm trying to say about his like/dislike of Muggles is that I don't believe that is what drove him to become Lord Voldemort. I think it was more a case of discovering that he held power over them. And with so many Slytherins around him who must have told him time and again about pureblood superiority, it must have seemed like a logical choice to Tom, to go after Muggles/Muggle-borns. Not because he hated them (he might have started to hate them at a later date), but because they were there and he had the power to do it. It's all about power. I also believe that had Tom gotten involved with a different crowd, he might easily have picked a different 'enemy'.

[info]prettypuddle

March 26 2004, 08:40:04 UTC 8 years ago

Nice essay. And happy birthday :)

While I am not a Voldemort fan, his history makes him an interesting study. It shows a complexity that makes him more than just the 'Bad Guy'.

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 14:08:25 UTC 8 years ago

Thank you! And yes, his history does suggest there's a lot more to him than what JKR uses in the books thus far.

[info]dien

March 26 2004, 11:48:09 UTC 8 years ago

Happy happy birthday birthday. Niiiiice essay-- Tom Riddle/Voldemort is one of the most fascinating characters of HPland to me as well (at least when we do like this above and not just write him off as JKR's cardboard cutout).

One of the things that I would like to see addressed in a Tom fic is the lure of immortality. He wants to live forever. Frankly, he's terrifed of death. He wants eternal life, and he was looking, actively, for a way to procure it. The name of his followers-- eaters of Death-- reflects this.... was there, then, some important life-changing experience in his youth that presented him with Death, right in the face, and gave him what might be considered a disproportionate desire to avoid it/conquer it?

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 14:14:55 UTC 8 years ago

Thanks. And that is a good point you bring up. Cluegirl mentioned something in an earlier comment that I believe could very well have led to Tom's need for immortality.

He was alive during WWII. In fact, he was living partly in the Muggle world during WWII. He must have seen the bombings, and people getting killed around him all the time. Perhaps that led to his realization of how fragile human beings are, wizards or not. I think that might very well have given him the idea that everything he was working so hard for could be taken from him in a second...by death. And thus, he set out to become immortal. That makes a lot of sense, I think.

[info]belleweather

March 26 2004, 11:55:07 UTC 8 years ago

I've never sympathized or even understood the whole Tom Riddle thing before reading that, and now between your marvellous essay and the fact that my subconscious seems to have been taken over by McTabby's "Two worlds and Inbetween" means I'll probably spend the entire weekend in front of the computer, in mad search for Riddle Fic.

I'm not entirely sure I ought to thank you, but I will anyway, because it's a wonderful essay and very rare that something can totally change the way I see a character the way it did.

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 14:16:25 UTC 8 years ago

Thank you. And I'm happy to hear this gave you a bit more insight of Tom/Voldemort. His history does suggest there's a lot more to him than what JKR shows us in the books, which makes him a fascinating character, I think. :-)

[info]xavantina

March 26 2004, 12:46:21 UTC 8 years ago

*Claps* Bravo!!

Very accurate essay. I feel like you really got to the point. Aa most definitely rec'ing.

And on a more friendly note: *Choir of kids with toads start singing* Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday dear [info]maeglinyedi, happy birthday to you. *Naked Voldie jumps out of cake*

Last part was over the top, wasn't it?

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 19:33:34 UTC 8 years ago

Thank you! And no, that last part isn't over the top at all! :D

[info]pinkwafer

March 26 2004, 12:55:09 UTC 8 years ago

(recced here by [info]quickquote)

Very interesting essay, and well thought out.

I particularly liked the idea that Tom became Voldemort because he could, although I think there's more to it than that.

IIRC, Voldemort still spouts a lot of pureblood crap, and his DE's certainly do. Part of this is clearly due to Voldemort's recruiting skills, telling the public what they want to hear. However, I don't think that is the entire story.

It is clear in CoS that he doesn't want to return to the orphanage, and as you've already proved, he obviously isn't treated wonderfully well there. However, at Hogwarts he is well fed, taught magic and his skills are recognised. Appreciated more than he has ever been, Tom must yearn to fit in with the purebloods within his house, and, thinking himself a freak, spurn the mudbloods to an extent.

Besides, after spending years preaching about the purity of blood, Tom would begin to convince himself. After killing his father I suspect he put all family ties behind him and moved on to the extent I doubt he recognizes his younger persona as really him anymore. Thus he probably doesn't see himself as a half-blood and I think he has managed to convince himself that he really is pureblood (or that he is so powerful that it doesn't matter). I think he truly believes a lot of the pureblood stuff that he says and does begin to hate them.

But then again, I don't believe that Voldemort is entirely sane anymore but that power has corrupted him.

(And for what it's worth, Happy Birthday! :))

[info]gehayi

March 26 2004, 13:05:31 UTC 8 years ago

Utterly and completely brilliant. I've bookmarked this and will be using it as reference for a future story about Tom Riddle.

And happy birthday!

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 19:51:12 UTC 8 years ago

Thank you! :-)

[info]melannen

March 26 2004, 13:05:58 UTC 8 years ago

I've been reading your journal for a while, but I think I have to friend you now; you posted this while I was writing this. . .

I like your essay even if I disagree with most your interpretations. You make some good points, especially about his strategy, the way he spent his time after Hogwarts, and the signifigance of his chance of name.

p.s. happy birthday!

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 19:52:22 UTC 8 years ago

Thank you. :-)

I've just read your post, and I don't agree with most points you make, so I left a comment to explain my views.

[info]contrariwise

March 26 2004, 13:50:49 UTC 8 years ago

Very nice. I've noticed people often separate Tom from Voldemort, like they're two different personalities, which (I think) makes it easier for them to say Voldemort is 2D or a flat villain. One of my favorite things in OotP is the scene in the DoM with Dumbledore, when Dumbledore calls LV "Tom."

When he reappeared as Lord Voldemort, I believe he didn't go about cursing the trousers off people and forcing them to join him. Tom was very good at playing people.

Totally. Tom says in CoS that he's always been able to charm the people he needed.

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 19:56:53 UTC 8 years ago

Yes, good point. To me, they are one and the same...he just changed his name along the way. And that part where Dumbledore calls him Tom is a favorite of mine as well. Honestly, I think that the whole distinction between Riddle and Voldemort is partly caused by the movie. Riddle is played by a cute boy, and thus fangirls adore Riddle but don't feel the same way about seventy-year-old Voldemort as he is described in the books, because, well, he's not cute. I don't mind what he looks like, since I find his character fascinating. ;-)

[info]mctabby

March 26 2004, 15:29:15 UTC 8 years ago

Great essay! I've added the link to this list of Riddle-related rants I'm trying to compile. (Only have four so far. Dumbledore rants outnumber Riddle rants greatly, it seems.)

Happy Birthday!

[info]maeglinyedi

March 26 2004, 19:58:21 UTC 8 years ago

Thank you! And there's a list? I had no idea there was a list! *adds to memories* :-)

And of course Dumbledore rants outnumber Voldie ones. Dumbledore is a bigger bastard, after all. Or so I believe. ;-)
Previous
← Ctrl← Alt
  • 1
  • 2
Next
Ctrl →Alt →
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…